Search
Search
Martin Charles MD
Show Description +
In this case Dr. Martin Charles presents a patient with diabetic proliferative retinopathy. A 3 port 23 G vitrectomy is accomplished with the Constellation Vision System. A complete core vitrectomy is performed followed by a detachment of the posterior hyaloid without changing instruments using only aspiration. Proportional reflux is used as a water hose to remove the hemorrhage from the surface of the retina. Later staining of the ILM with brilliant blue G dye is performed and it is removed with the Grieshaber DSP ILM forceps using the Grieshaber DSP pneumatic handle.
Posted: 6/13/2011
Martin Charles MD
In this case Dr. Martin Charles presents a patient with diabetic proliferative retinopathy. A 3 port 23 G vitrectomy is accomplished with the Constellation Vision System. A complete core vitrectomy is performed followed by a detachment of the posterior hyaloid without changing instruments using only aspiration. Proportional reflux is used as a water hose to remove the hemorrhage from the surface of the retina. Later staining of the ILM with brilliant blue G dye is performed and it is removed with the Grieshaber DSP ILM forceps using the Grieshaber DSP pneumatic handle.
Posted: 6/13/2011
![[2019] Amniotic Membrane Placement for Repair of Recurrent Macular Hole](https://d33x7gwyb2b5z6.cloudfront.net/eyetube/thumbs/gldaw.jpg?auto=compress,format&w=180)
Please log in to leave a comment.
Comments
Just Now
matias iglicki
14 years ago
you can see that you are wtching the same eye because of the blood on the optic nerve well done martin excellent video thank you very much indeed for these videos
Martin Charles
14 years ago
Thanks !
Martin Charles
14 years ago
Congratulations. It is a very smart comment. The answer to that is that in the first part I use contact indirect lenses and in the final part a direct lens. When using the indirect lenses the image is inverted and as although I use a Volk Rols image re inverter in that part, it inverts only the surgeon optical pathway, leaving the other part of the scope for the assistant and for the cammera inverted. My scope has 2 scopes in it, it is a Leica M841. That is why it seems another eye, because you see in the first part of the surgery the macula in one side and in the other on the other side
Martin Charles
14 years ago
Congratulations. It is a very smart comment. The answer to that is that in the first part I use contact indirect lenses and in the final part a direct lens. When using the indirect lenses the image is inverted and as although I use a Volk Rols image re inverter in that part, it inverts only the surgeon optical pathway, leaving the other part of the scope for the assistant and for the cammera inverted. My scope has 2 scopes in it, it is a Leica M841. That is why it seems another eye, because you see in the first part of the surgery the macula in one side and in the other on the other side
Kristian Klemp
14 years ago
The peeling shown is not in the same eye! Why is that? ;)
tanvir azhar
14 years ago
WONDERFUL.BEAUTIFULLY MANAGED.I LOVE IT